Conference paper Open Access

Assessing the Integration of Electrified On-Board Systems in an MDAO framework for a small transport aircraft

Fioriti, M.; Della Vecchia, P.; Donelli, G.; Hansmann, P.


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="URL">https://zenodo.org/record/5735193</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Fioriti, M.</creatorName>
      <givenName>M.</givenName>
      <familyName>Fioriti</familyName>
      <affiliation>Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Della Vecchia, P.</creatorName>
      <givenName>P.</givenName>
      <familyName>Della Vecchia</familyName>
      <affiliation>Università di Napoli "Federico II" , Naples, Italy</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Donelli, G.</creatorName>
      <givenName>G.</givenName>
      <familyName>Donelli</familyName>
      <affiliation>German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of System Architectures in Aeronautics, Hamburg</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Hansmann, P.</creatorName>
      <givenName>P.</givenName>
      <familyName>Hansmann</familyName>
      <affiliation>Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH), Aachen, Germany</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Assessing the Integration of Electrified On-Board Systems in an MDAO framework for a small transport aircraft</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2021</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Multidisciplinary Design Analysis</subject>
    <subject>Multidisciplinary Design Optimization</subject>
    <subject>On-Board Systems</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2021-07-28</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="ConferencePaper"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/5735193</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.2514/6.2021-3094</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/agile4</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The integration of on-board systems design within the aircraft design process is often&lt;br&gt;
considered only in the late part of the initial design. This is acceptable for civil aircraft using&lt;br&gt;
standard technology systems. However, facing with MEA and AEA concepts and different&lt;br&gt;
possible architectures, the systems design and the assessment of their effects on the overall&lt;br&gt;
aircraft should be moved up in the usual design process. This paper deals with evaluation of&lt;br&gt;
the effect of different on-board systems architecture, with a different electrification level, on&lt;br&gt;
the overall aircraft design. These effects have been evaluated using three different MDA&lt;br&gt;
workflows developed within the AGILE4.0 European research project. The workflows are&lt;br&gt;
defined with an increasing number of disciplines to show how the effect of a proper selection&lt;br&gt;
of a systems architecture is differently caught by each one. In this way it is possible to define&lt;br&gt;
which disciplines should be included for the systems architecture assessment. The results show&lt;br&gt;
a save of 1% of MTOM for the AEA applied to a small turboprop aircraft when only the OBS&lt;br&gt;
mass is assessed. Increasing workflow complexity, adding performance and engine design the&lt;br&gt;
save increase to 1.2%. Finally, the save increases to 1.3% when the effect on engine SFC is&lt;br&gt;
also considered.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
  <fundingReferences>
    <fundingReference>
      <funderName>European Commission</funderName>
      <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/100010661</funderIdentifier>
      <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/Horizon 2020 Framework Programme - Research and Innovation action/815122/">815122</awardNumber>
      <awardTitle>AGILE 4.0: Towards cyber-physical collaborative aircraft development</awardTitle>
    </fundingReference>
  </fundingReferences>
</resource>
42
55
views
downloads
Views 42
Downloads 55
Data volume 38.9 MB
Unique views 35
Unique downloads 49

Share

Cite as