Conference paper Open Access

Assessing the Integration of Electrified On-Board Systems in an MDAO framework for a small transport aircraft

Fioriti, M.; Della Vecchia, P.; Donelli, G.; Hansmann, P.


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Multidisciplinary Design Analysis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Multidisciplinary Design Optimization</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">On-Board Systems</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20211201014853.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">5735193</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Università di Napoli "Federico II" , Naples, Italy</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Della Vecchia, P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of System Architectures in Aeronautics, Hamburg</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Donelli, G.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH), Aachen, Germany</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Hansmann, P.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">707324</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:1bcb44dc41c4a3068e95f03cb03d1801</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/5735193/files/6.2021-3094.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2021-07-28</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-agile4</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:5735193</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Fioriti, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Assessing the Integration of Electrified On-Board Systems in an MDAO framework for a small transport aircraft</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-agile4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">815122</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">AGILE 4.0: Towards cyber-physical collaborative aircraft development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The integration of on-board systems design within the aircraft design process is often&lt;br&gt;
considered only in the late part of the initial design. This is acceptable for civil aircraft using&lt;br&gt;
standard technology systems. However, facing with MEA and AEA concepts and different&lt;br&gt;
possible architectures, the systems design and the assessment of their effects on the overall&lt;br&gt;
aircraft should be moved up in the usual design process. This paper deals with evaluation of&lt;br&gt;
the effect of different on-board systems architecture, with a different electrification level, on&lt;br&gt;
the overall aircraft design. These effects have been evaluated using three different MDA&lt;br&gt;
workflows developed within the AGILE4.0 European research project. The workflows are&lt;br&gt;
defined with an increasing number of disciplines to show how the effect of a proper selection&lt;br&gt;
of a systems architecture is differently caught by each one. In this way it is possible to define&lt;br&gt;
which disciplines should be included for the systems architecture assessment. The results show&lt;br&gt;
a save of 1% of MTOM for the AEA applied to a small turboprop aircraft when only the OBS&lt;br&gt;
mass is assessed. Increasing workflow complexity, adding performance and engine design the&lt;br&gt;
save increase to 1.2%. Finally, the save increases to 1.3% when the effect on engine SFC is&lt;br&gt;
also considered.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.2514/6.2021-3094</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">conferencepaper</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
42
57
views
downloads
Views 42
Downloads 57
Data volume 40.3 MB
Unique views 35
Unique downloads 50

Share

Cite as